Prephysics Research Programme

Publications

The programme’s open research basis.

Research focus · Lane–Seifert

How strong is the supernova evidence for timescape?

Four connected stages: reproduction, comparison, mechanism clarification and a planned prediction test on DES-Dovekie.

Explore the research
01Curated paper record

Fourteen DOI-linked research papers

This page distinguishes research papers from other public research records. All fourteen papers below are publicly available preprints; none is presented here as a peer-reviewed publication. Journal status, where relevant, is kept separate from this public register. A separate preregistration block follows the paper register; the Zenodo Community also contains book, guide and methodology records, so its total record count is higher. For preregistrations, the dated Version DOI of the scientific execution anchor is primary; the Concept DOI additionally opens the complete and current version series, including later clerical clarifications.

Structural Preconditions of Physical Description: A Functional Account of Applicability Conditions

Rebases P1 as a goal-relative functional account: four admitted functions form a partial dependency structure and support explicit two-component projection warrants for A1–A6; the former seven-level linear emergence path is no longer used as evidential basis.

Concept DOI ↗

Levels of Description and the Burden of Crossing Them: A Functional-Logical Account of Transitions in Physical Explanation

Claim-relative roles, nine routes, transition profiles, and the Bridge Burden / Discharge / Debt architecture.

Concept DOI ↗

When Physical Applicability Fails: A Token-Level Verdict Protocol for Physical Claims

A token-level verdict protocol for physical claims. It freezes a versioned claim, adjudicates token satisfaction, filters applicability-relevant deficits, and records a time-indexed PASS / OPEN / Loss of Applicability verdict.

Concept DOI ↗

When AI “Discovers” Physics: An Applicability-Diagnostic Verdict Protocol for AI-Based Physical Claims

A verdict protocol for AI-based physical discovery claims.

Concept DOI ↗

When Interpretations Fail the Test: A Diagnostic Protocol for Claims about the Quantum Measurement Problem

Applicability diagnostics for interpretations of quantum mechanics.

Concept DOI ↗

When Physics Demands Its Own Beginning: The Initial-Conditions Regress and the Limits of Presuppositionless Explanation in Cosmology

The initial-conditions regress and the limits of presuppositionless explanation.

Concept DOI ↗

What Origin Strategies Cannot Avoid: A Diagnostic Protocol and Constraint Map for Cosmological Origin Claims

A constraint map across cosmological origin strategies.

Concept DOI ↗

The Finality Demand in Fundamental Physics: A Self-Applicability Diagnostic of ‘Final Theory’ and Unification Claims

Self-applicability and the diagnostic limits of final-theory claims.

Concept DOI ↗

Applicability Diagnostics in Fundamental Physics: A Functional Necessity Argument and a Fourteen-Case Calibration

Introduces the Functional Incompleteness Argument (FIA): complete, auditable claim-level applicability diagnosis requires recoverable requirement, transition-warrant and token-satisfaction information, none recoverable from the other two. P1 → P2 → P3 is one concrete realisation; the separate fourteen-case study calibrates S1–S7.

Concept DOI ↗

From Fit to Attribution: Support Provenance and Attributional Resolution in Cosmology

Tracks the highest claim-resolution licensed by a documented cosmological analysis, distinguishing evidential strength from attributional resolution.

Concept DOI ↗

Observer-Vertex Compatibility of Dressed Timescape Observables: A Low-Redshift Obstruction in a General-Spacetime Density Diagnostic

Identifies a low-redshift observer-vertex compatibility obstruction when the standard dressed timescape distance and expansion-rate observables are used together in a general-spacetime diagnostic.

Concept DOI ↗

Ruling Out Entirely? Modal Compression and Selective Scope Rendering in the Galactic Centre Excess Debate

A modal-audit case study comparing body-level warrant, citable-surface scope, revision history and a frozen ADS–INSPIRE reception corpus.

Concept DOI ↗

Preregistered research protocols

Publicly deposited protocols that fix analysis decisions before execution. They are listed separately from the fourteen research papers above.

Strand 1 · Executed protocol and reproduction test

The Strand 1 reference runs used R9 with the runner frozen in TA-03 v0.6. The Bayesian reproduction test ended with a published STOP record ↗. The subsequent maximum-likelihood check reproduced both published best-fit values at zCMB ≥ 0.033; the STOP remains unchanged. Separately preregistered Strand 2 · v0.5.4 ↗ was published as Terminal Record v1.5 ↗ on 27 October 2026. Results, scope and project status →

Current series · Concept DOI ↗

Strand 3 · Preregistered mechanism study of the Lane–Seifert evidence contrast

Research plan R5.6 with amendments A1–A3, deposited on 31 October 2026 by Harald Zierhut and Thomas Schwarz. It separates two mean maps and three covariance treatments, with β in [0,4] and [0,7], on P+1690 and P+580, and adds a false-positive control on ΛCDM-generated data, subject to registered generator checks, and a bias-correction test. Analysis and decision rules are preregistered. No results yet. Project status →

Concept DOI ↗

Programme outlines and planned studies

Public planning records are listed separately from completed studies and preregistered execution protocols.

Lane–Seifert · Four-stage programme and planned Strand 4

Harald Zierhut and Thomas Schwarz, 1 November 2026. The programme connects reproduction, controlled comparison, mechanism clarification and a planned predictive transfer test on DES-Dovekie. The public record contains the English programme outline and a SHA-256 commitment to the detailed plan. Strand 4 is planned, not yet preregistered. It reports no completed prediction or DES test result.

Version DOI ↗